Drones: The Political Effects of UAVs
Together with my colleagues Nicholas Wheeler and David Dunn at the Institute for Conflict, Cooperation and Security, this project investigates whether and how the use of drones by a state on the territory of another actor increases or decreases the propensities for conflict and cooperation both within and between these actors.
As evidenced by existing data, drones as a means of contemporary warfare are primarily deployed in situations of insurgency and civil war that are considered as international security threats, specifically as threats to US and allied interests, because international terrorist networks have become embedded in the countries concerned: al-Qaeda and its local (Taliban) supporters in Afghanistan and neighbouring Pakistan, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) in Yemen, and al-Shabab in Somalia. Consequently, our primary research question gives rise to two further sub-questions:
What impact does the use of drones have on the possibilities for containing and/or ending intrastate conflict?
What impact does the use of drones within a state’s borders have on the relationship between this state and the intervening state?
The project is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council of the UK.
A full description of the project can be downloaded here.
Outputs to date:
- Drone Use in Counter-Insurgency and Counter-Terrorism: Policy or Policy Component? (co-authored article with David Hastings Dunn in RUSI Whitehall Report no.2, 2013, pp. 97-104)
- Predators and Peace: Explaining the Failure of the Pakistani Conflict Settlement Process in 2013-4 (co-authored article with Talat Farooq and Scott Lucas in RUSI Civil Wars vol. 22, no.1, 2020, pp. 26-63)